More Information

Submitted: July 07, 2023 | Approved: July 20, 2023 | Published: July 21, 2023

How to cite this article: Focardi S, Pepi M. Sea Level Rise Impacts in Coastal Areas and Possible Mitigation Engineering Approaches. Ann Civil Environ Eng. 2023; 7: 030-036.

DOI: 10.29328/journal.acee.1001053

Copyright License: © 2023 Focardi S, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Keywords: Coastal areas; Sea level rise; Climate change; Engineering coastal interventions

 FullText PDF

Sea Level Rise Impacts in Coastal Areas and Possible Mitigation Engineering Approaches

Silvano Focardi1 and Milva Pepi2*

1Department of Physical Sciences, Earth and Environment, Università di Siena, Via P.A. Mattioli, 4-53100 Siena, Italy
2Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Fano Marine Centre, Viale Adriatico, 1-N-61032 Fano, Italy

*Address for Correspondence: Milva Pepi, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Fano Marine Centre, Viale Adriatico, 1-N-61032 Fano, Italy, Email: milva.pepi@szn.it

Coastal areas are subjected to both natural and man-made actions, leading to a deterioration of coastal structures. Climate change has had a heavy impact on these areas in recent years. An important consequence of these actions is sea level rise. This phenomenon is the most important cause of coastal erosion, a serious problem with ecological, economic, and human health consequences. The countermeasures to contrast this phenomenon and the degradation of the entire coastal system, are represented by engineering interventions. These basically consist of approaches for adaptation to sea level rise, namely protection, retreat, and accommodation. Variations and site adaptation of these actions can involve procedures of no intervention; advancement; protection; retreat; accommodation; and ecosystem-based adaptation. While these procedures have provided coastal benefits and protection, in the long run, they may cause further coastal disruption and further aggravate the situation. Such interventions, therefore, require an accurate assessment of the advantages and disadvantages. However, it is certainly necessary to proceed with actions aimed at mitigating climate change, respecting the rules in a sustainable way.

Coasts present high biological and ecological productivity and allow different activities including fishing, aquaculture, and tourism. Coastal areas are exposed to the continuous action of several natural factors including wave action, wind, tide, sediment transport, sediment supply from rivers to sea, soil subsidence, relative sea level change, rainfall, frequency, and intensity of extreme climate events, including storms [1]. Other factors impacting coastal levels comprehend an increase in population, urbanization, tourism, industrialization, and other development activities that, complexively, have introduced changes in coastal features and processes [2,3]. Additional agents acting on coasts include maritime constructions and coastal defense such as ports and barriers, which interfere with the dynamics of sediments [4]. Furthermore, the construction of residential, industrial, and recreational infrastructures, the management of river basins, and the regulation of watercourses to provide water resources for drinking, irrigation, and industrial use, can induce alterations in vegetation and forest drainage, influencing ultimately the balance of the coasts [5].

Coastal areas have changed considerably during the last century, mainly due to the action of climate change. In particular, coasts are exposed to the impacts of sea level rise, of which climate change is the main cause. Climate change affects coastal processes and dynamics through changes in winds, storm surges, or wave action. Variations in wind intensity, wave energy, and sea level cause major effects on coastlines, triggering major local impacts such as flooding and erosion [6,7]. The damage to the coasts, combined with the development and concentration of the population in the coastal areas, requires urgent adaptations and interventions [8].

In this mini-review, the causes and consequences of sea level rise have been described. Possible engineering interventions aimed at restoring the coastal features have also been described, thus favoring populations living in the coastal areas.

Climate change and other agents influencing sea level rise

Sea level rise is the result of the activity of various agents, such as climate change, structural factors, and human factors [9]. Climate change is the main cause of sea level rise and includes occasional changes and increases in the concentrations of greenhouse gases. Climate change can promote the thermal expansion of the oceans, one of the main agents involved in sea level rise (Figure 1). In fact, greenhouse gas emissions cause an increase in the temperature of the oceans, with variations in the density of seawater, with the mass of seawater remaining at a constant value [10]. As a consequence of rising temperatures, the volume of seawater gradually becomes larger, leading to sea level rise up to a certain level. Particularly in recent years, the seawater surface temperature has shown a definite growth pathway [11,12]. Since 1960, thermal expansion has contributed to about 25% of sea level rise [13]. In the period from 1993 to 2009, approximately 30% of global sea level rise was attributed to this phenomenon [14]. It has also been hypothesized that by 2100, sea level rise values above 12 cm will be caused by thermal expansion [12,15].


Download Image

Figure 1: Agents affecting sea level rise and their mechanisms (modified from [12]).

Climate change can promote the melting of glaciers and small ice sheets, along with the melting of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, leading to sea level rise. The melting of glaciers and ice caps strongly influences sea level rise. In fact, global climate change has affected the melting of glaciers and ice caps, which could cause sea levels to rise by more than 2 m. From 2003 to 2010, ice and ice sheet mass decreased by about 148 ± 30 Gt yr-1 as continental glacier melt increased and this contributed about 0.41 ± 0.08 mm yr-1 to sea level rise [16]. During the period from 1992 to 2018, the average sea-level rise was about 10.8 mm due to the melting of Antarctic glaciers [17] To date, as greenhouse gas emissions increase, the melting of glaciers and ice sheets caused by climate change has become the main factor of sea-level rise, contributing about 50% [18,19]. This condition is likely to persist or increase in the future [20-22].

The increase in sea level due to structural factors mainly includes the decrease in ocean volume and land subsidence caused by tectonic movement. Their contribution to sea level rise is about 10% in addition to contributions from thermal expansion of the oceans, melting glaciers, and human activities. However, from a local perspective, the relative sea level rise caused by vertical geological movement may far exceed the impact of melting glaciers and the thermal expansion of the oceans [23-26] (Figure 1).

Human-related factors also contribute to sea level rise, such as groundwater and oil extraction, deforestation, and damming along rivers, although the impact on sea level rise is not as big as that of glaciers and ice caps [27]. Some anthropogenic activities can cause subsidence in some coastal cities, resulting in land elevation lower than sea level elevation [28-30]. Variations in inland waters are another factor related to sea level rise, including the aforementioned groundwater extraction and other human activities, such as irrigation and deforestation. The mechanism of their effect on sea level rise is almost the same as that of groundwater extraction, that is, the jump of freshwater areas in the coastal zone is significantly less than that of seawater. Furthermore, the intense damming along the rivers during the second half of the last century also influenced the sea level change, lowering overall levels by 0.5 mm yr-1 [31]. Dam building has also reduced the sediment input to river deltas, increasing the effect of sea level rise in these areas.

Although all these factors have an impact on the rise of sea level, the degree of impact is not easy to determine. Until recently, it has only been possible to detect that about 30%, 50%, 10%, and 10% of the contribution to sea level rise could be attributed to the thermal expansion of the oceans, the melting of glaciers, humans activities, and geological movements, respectively [12] (Figure 1).

Sea level rise

Sea level rise was reported to be less than 1 mm yr-1 until about the mid-1800s. Due to the development of the industrial age and the increase in the burning of fossil fuels including coal, oil, and natural gas, the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere has gradually increased. Since the beginning of the industrial revolution, the carbon dioxide (CO2) content in the atmosphere has increased. Quantification of these values showed variations of approximately 50%, from 175-275 μg ml-1 to 419 μg ml-1 today. This has caused the Earth to warm up by about 1 °C over the past 100 years. As previously reported, rising temperatures, ice sheets, and melting continental glaciers have caused seawater to warm and expand. In response to these changes, the global sea level has risen at a faster rate than in the previous 7000-8000 years [32]. Tide gauges have highlighted the global average of documented historical record sea level rise values ranging from ~1.2 to ~1.7 mm yr-1 for much of the twentieth century [33-35].

Satellite-based observations allow us to measure the average acceleration of sea-level rise. The average rate of rise of 3.4 mm yr-1 over the past 27 years has now increased to about 4.8 mm yr-1, based on observations of the past 10 years [36].

Sea level measurements need to take into account aspects such as tide gauges and satellite observations, as they provide a good understanding of past and present sea levels. However, the challenge for coastal regions around the globe is projecting sea level rise and its impact into the future. This is an important goal of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), but individual geographic entities (from local governments to national governments) are simultaneously involved in developing future sea level rise projections for their regions [27]. Future climate projections are developed through global climate models, which include uncertainties and assumptions about future greenhouse gas emissions and model the inputs or factors that will affect global climate, including ice melt and consequently sea level rise [32]. Today, predictions or projections for the next few decades are generally consistent, but estimates for the end of the century vary across models and depend on representative concentration pathways, with uncertainties and ever-widening ranges by 2100. The most recent studies indicate that the values for the end of the century (2100) vary from a minimum of ~50 cm to a maximum of ~310 cm, depending on the scenarios of greenhouse gas emissions and various probabilities or uncertainties, in particular regarding the extent of the melting of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets [37].

In this century alone, a sea level rise of just 1 m will create substantial problems for developed coastlines around the globe. A recent global assessment determined that approximately 110 million people live below current high water levels and 250 million occupy land below current annual flood levels [38]. For the first few meters of sea level rise, more than 3 million additional people are at risk for every 2.5 cm of rise. One billion people today, about 13% of the entire world population, live less than 10 m above high tide.

Frequent and extreme climate change risks have been recorded in the twenty-first century, compared to previous years. Sea level rise is likely to continue to increase even after reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, as stated in the Paris Agreement on climate change. Several studies have shown that sea level rise will develop unevenly across the world, with people living on coasts most exposed to the risk of coastal flooding by 2050 [35].

Engineering interventions to counteract sea level rise

The threat of future sea level rise to coastal cities and low-lying areas around the world, combined with storm surges, erosion, and flooding, and the rapid degradation of natural coastal systems, will be a major societal and infrastructure challenge of this century [35,39-44].

Potential negative impacts of sea level rise are coastal flooding, accelerated coastal erosion, saltwater intrusion, and land subsidence [45]. Globally, sea level rise is also held ultimately responsible for long-term coastal erosion problems [46]. The impacts of coastal erosion and sea level rise include loss of life, disruption of economic sectors, and degradation of natural ecosystems and biodiversity [47].

The first study by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): Coastal Management Subgroup and Response Strategies Working Group proposed three approaches for sea level rise adaptation, namely protection, retreat, and accommodation [48]. Discussions about available methods have evolved and, based on a recent management guide for disaster risk reduction in the European coastal zone, several strategies have been adopted [49]. Possible intervention strategies have been described and proposed in various studies [50-52]. Adaptation measures could improve the socio-economic conditions and natural resources of the country. Adaptation policies should ensure that vulnerabilities to climate change risks decrease and also help reduce greenhouse gas emissions [49].

Several coastal defense strategies to protect against threats from erosion and sea level rise include i) a no-action procedure, which means “do nothing” and leaving the situation as it is. This represents an inactive intervention, vacant land or available wetland that has insignificant physical and economic impacts that are selected as sacrificial areas for downstream flood or erosion impact areas (Figure 2); ii) advancement interventions, building structures above sea level, using sand or other materials, with the aim of reducing the risk of flooding for the coasts. This can be termed a “seaward move” and is only performed if coastal land remediation is absolutely necessary, as the strategy leads to various negative impacts on the environment. Adjacent ecosystems, wetlands, salt marshes, and mangroves are in fact becoming more vulnerable to the effects of any coastal compression (Figure 2); iii) a protective intervention is carried out through the introduction of elements capable of reducing the impact of seawater, which would otherwise cause flooding of the coasts and coastal cities. These elements that can protect against floods include rigid protections such as dykes, embankments, breakwaters, barriers, and weirs, while also preventing coastal erosion and water intrusion into the soil. Other protections include sediments and dunes. All these measures are implemented in combination and are called hybrid measures. They can be defined as a “line maintenance strategy” that maintains the existing shoreline. They are usually expensive due to the construction of rigid structures, such as dams, revetments, and breakwaters. For shore control, hard structures such as breakwaters and revetments are the most effective, fastest, and easiest. Perpendicular structures such as groynes and breakwaters promote natural sediment deposition and beach accumulation. However, downward erosion is expected (Figure 2); iv) the retreat intervention, consisting of an adaptation strategy that includes within it three forms, namely migration, displacement, and relocation. Migration involves the permanent or semi-permanent movement of an individual for a minimum of one year. Displacement is a voluntary movement by an individual for the impacts of climate change or any other climate-related risk, while relocation involves government bodies helping people to relocate to a different location, usually by providing incentives for families. This type of intervention can be defined as “managed realignment” and involves the relocation of critical structures or land use inland. The costs of “managed realignment” consist of the purchase of land, the reconstruction of infrastructure, and the relocation of existing assets (Figure 2); v) the process of accommodation includes both biophysical and governmental adaptations, aimed at reducing coastal risks by reducing impacts on human lives, livestock, ecosystems and human activities. Switching to elevated or floating homes, switching to saltwater resistant or tolerant crop varieties, contingency plans, insurance plans, and setback zones by government institutions are some of the methods that come under the housing to deal with the elevation of sea level. This strategy can be defined as “adaptation or accommodation” representing the continued use of land at risk with interventions such as platform level rise and elevated buildings (Figure 2); vi) ecosystem-based adaptation interventions provide combinations of protection and advanced benefits by preserving and restoring coastal ecosystems. The system helps narrow the path of waves and reduce the speed of storms by acting as a barrier. They also reduce soil erosion by trapping coastal sediments. This strategy can be defined as a “limited intervention” that requires little cost, such as modifying existing land use, restoring wetlands, and replanting mangroves. Coastal protection system selection is site specific. Soft engineering techniques are environmentally friendly but are expensive for maintenance and take longer to produce significant impacts [49] (Figure 2).


Download Image

Figure 2: Different intervention strategies facing sea level rise at the coastal level.

Coastal adaptation is also a clear collective action problem: a group benefits from an intervention but no individual has sufficient incentive to act alone [53]. Social conflict barriers can arise whenever stakeholders hold conflicting interests that can be overcome through governance to develop norms, laws, or policies in order to resolve conflicts [54]. Formal institutions can help, but other informal means and community involvement are needed. Social barriers remain challenging and difficult to overcome and can be further exacerbated when local needs, contexts, and priorities are not adequately considered [55]. Solutions considered effective in some regions may be ignored or perceived negatively in other areas. A clear example is found in the low-crested and submerged structures that have been used extensively in Europe, including with environmental benefits [56], but it can be perceived as negative, for example, in tropical regions. Societal challenges to adaptation may also be driven by divergent interests among parties, including who benefits and who pays, which can be an important decision factor in adaptation planning. Other social barriers are related to conflicts over cultural and social priorities and constraints. Barriers to adaptation can be overcome through efforts to fill gaps in technology, economic and human resources, management, and institutional change. Understanding risk, planning, and financial adaptation are key to accelerating adaptation [57]. Furthermore, the process known as the “Paris alignment”, which refers to the alignment of financial flows consistent with a path to low greenhouse gas emissions and climate-resilient development, also presents an opportunity to expand adaptation efforts among activities in global coastal zones [35].

Coastal protection measures are based on management strategy options as i) do nothing; ii) move seaward/advancement; iii) hold the line/protection; iv) managed realignment/retreat; v) limited intervention/accommodation; vi) ecosystem-based adaptation [49]. The intervention measures can be of hard and soft engineering or a combination of both. Determining the functionality and impacts of these coastal structures should be further carried out at specific sites with detailed scenarios by using advanced numerical modeling tools for better impact assessments. The proposed engineering approaches should be technically feasible, economically achievable, environmentally friendly, and socially acceptable. It is important to propose new solutions and collaborate with agencies related to the field of coastal management, engineering, and marine sciences for valuable planning and evaluation.

Sea level rise is a major coastal problem with serious ecological, economic, and human health consequences. The engineering interventions can alleviate the problems of the sea level rise and the consequent serious problem of coastal erosion. However, while on the one hand, the interventions improve the situation of the coasts, on the other hand, they can cause other complications and modify the original environment, adding further imbalances to the whole system. An important and detailed local assessment of the pros and cons is therefore required. Different adaptation strategies are effective to face the important damages caused by sea level rise on the level of the coast. The poorest sections of society, rural dwellers, and island communities are subject to serious vulnerabilities if immediate adaptation strategies and countermeasures to climate change are not provided.

  1. Di Paola G, Minervino Amodio A, Dilauro G, Rodriguez G, Rosskopf CM. Shoreline Evolution and Erosion Vulnerability Assessment along the Central Adriatic Coast with the Contribution of UAV Beach Monitoring. Geosciences. 2022; 12: 353. https:// doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12100353.
  2. Pramanik M K., Biswas S S , Mondal B , Pal R. Coastal vulnerability assessment of the predicted sea level rise in the coastal zone of Krishna–Godavari delta region, Andhra Pradesh, east coast of India. Environ Dev Sustain. 2016 ; 18 : 1635-1655.
  3. Armenio E, Mossa M. On the Need for an Integrated Large-Scale Methodology of Coastal Management: A Methodological Proposal. J Mar Sci Eng. 2020; 8: 385. doi:10.3390/jmse8060385
  4. Feola A, Lisi I, Salmeri A, Venti F, Pedroncini A, Gabellini M, Romano E. Platform of integrated tools to support environmental studies and management of dredging activities. J Environ Manage. 2016 Jan 15;166:357-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.10.022. Epub 2015 Oct 30. PMID: 26523977.
  5. De Serio F, Armenio E, Mossa M, Petrillo AF. How to Define Priorities in Coastal Vulnerability Assessment. Geosciences. 2018; 8: 415. doi:10.3390/geosciences8110415.
  6. Martínez M L , Intralawan A , Vázquez G , Pérez-Maqueo O , Sutton P , Landgrave R. The coasts of our world: Ecological, economic and social importance. Ecol Econ. 2007 ; 63 : 254-272.
  7. Reguero B G , Storlazzi C D , Gibbs A E , Shope J B , Cole A D , Cumming K A , Beck M W. The value of US coral reefs for flood risk reduction. Nat Sustain. 2021 ; 1: 11.
  8. Hinkel J , Aerts J C J H , Brown S , Jiménez J A , Lincke D , Nicholls R J , Scussolini P , Sanchez-Arcilla A , Vafeidis A , Addo K A. The ability of societies to adapt to twenty-first-century sea-level rise. Nat Clim Chang. 2018 ; 8 : 570-578.
  9. Hansen J , Sato M , Hearty P , Ruedy R , Kelley M , Masson-Delmotte V , Russell G , Tselioudis G , Cao J , Rignot E . et al. Ice melt, sea level rise, and superstorms: Evidence from paleoclimate data, climate modeling, and modern observations that 2 A degrees C global warming could be dangerous. Atmos Chem Phys. 2016 ; 16 : 3761–3812.
  10. Khojasteh D, Glamore W, Heimhuber V, Felder S. Sea level rise impacts on estuarine dynamics: A review. Sci Total Environ. 2021 Aug 1;780:146470. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146470. Epub 2021 Mar 16. PMID: 34030326.
  11. Levitus S, Antonov JI, Boyer TP, Locarnini RA, Garcia HE, Mishonov AV. Global ocean heat content 1955-2008 in light of recently revealed instrumentation problems. Geophys Res Lett. 2009; 36: e037155.
  12. Dong L , Cao J , Liu X. Recent Developments in Sea-Level Rise and Its Related Geological Disasters Mitigation: A Review. J Mar Sci Eng. 2022 ; 10 : 355. https:// doi.org/10.3390/jmse10030355.
  13. Domingues CM, Church JA, White NJ, Gleckler PJ, Wijffels SE, Barker PM, Dunn JR. Improved estimates of upper-ocean warming and multi-decadal sea-level rise. Nature. 2008 Jun 19;453(7198):1090-3. doi: 10.1038/nature07080. PMID: 18563162.
  14. Cazenave A, Llovel W. Contemporary sea level rise. Ann Rev Mar Sci. 2010;2:145-73. doi: 10.1146/annurev-marine-120308-081105. PMID: 21141661.
  15. Micheal O, Bruce G, Hinkel J, Roderik V, Frederikse T. Sea Level Rise and Implications for Low Lying Islands, Coasts and Communities; IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate. 2019; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): Geneva, Switzerland.
  16. Jacob T, Wahr J, Pfeffer WT, Swenson S. Recent contributions of glaciers and ice caps to sea level rise. Nature. 2012 Feb 8;482(7386):514-8. doi: 10.1038/nature10847. PMID: 22318519.
  17. IMBIE Team. Mass balance of the Greenland Ice Sheet from 1992 to 2018. Nature. 2020 Mar;579(7798):233-239. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1855-2. Epub 2019 Dec 10. PMID: 31822019.
  18. Cazenave A, Meyssignac B, Ablain M, Balmaseda M, Bamber J, Barletta V, Beckley B, Benveniste J, Berthier E, Blazquez A. Global sea-level budget 1993-present. Earth Syst Sci Data. 2018 ; 10 : 1551-1590.
  19. Edwards TL, Nowicki S, Marzeion B, Hock R, Goelzer H, et al. Nature. 2021 May;593(7857):74-82. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03302-y. Epub 2021 May 5. PMID: 33953415.
  20. Rignot E, Velicogna I, van den Broeke MR, Monaghan A, Lenaerts J. Acceleration of the contribution of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets to sea level rise. Geophys Res Lett. 2011; 38: e046583.
  21. Kopp RE, DeConto RM, Bader DA, Hay CC, Horton RM, Kulp S, Oppenheimer M, Pollard D, Strauss BH. Evolving Understanding of Antarctic Ice-Sheet Physics and Ambiguity in Probabilistic Sea-Level Projections. Earths Future. 2017; 5: 1217-1233.
  22. Pattyn F, Ritz C, Hanna E, Asay-Davis X, DeConto R, Durand G, Favier L, Fettweis X, Goelzer H, Golledge NR. The Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets are under 1.5 degrees C global warming. Nat Clim Chang. 2018; 8: 1053-1061.
  23. Lambeck K, Antonioli F, Anzidei M, Ferranti L, Leoni G, Scicchitano G, Silenzi S. Sea level change along the Italian coast during the Holocene and projections for the future. Quat Int. 2011; 232: 250-257.
  24. Anzidei M, Lambeck K, Antonioli F, Furlani S, Vannucci G. Coastal Structure, Sea-Level Changes and Vertical Motion of the Land in the Mediterranean. 2016; Special Publications; Geological Society: London, UK.
  25. Antonioli F, De Falco G, Lo Presti V, Moretti L, Scardino G, Anzidei M, Bonaldo D, Carniel S, Leoni G, Furlani S. Relative Sea-Level Rise and Potential Submersion Risk for 2100 on 16 Coastal Plains of the Mediterranean Sea. Water. 2020; 12: 2173.
  26. Fox-Kemper B , Hewitt B H T , Xiao C , Aðalgeirsdóttir G , Drijfhout S S , Edwards T L , Golledge N R , Hemer M , Kopp R E , Krinner G . Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis; A Contribution of Working Group of Sea Level to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2021; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): Geneva, Switzerland .
  27. Zanchettin D , Bruni S , Raicich F , Lionello P , Zerbini S. Review article: Sea-level rise in Venice: Historic and future trends. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 2021 ; 21 : 2643-2678.
  28. Chai JC, Shen SL, Zhu HH, Zhang XL. Land subsidence due to groundwater drawdown in Shanghai. Geotechnique. 2004; 54: 143-147.
  29. Shen SL, Xu YS. Numerical evaluation of land subsidence induced by groundwater pumping in Shanghai. Can Geotech J. 2011; 48: 1378–1392.
  30. Li M G , Chen J J , Xu Y S , Tong D G , Cao W W , Shi Y J. Effects of groundwater exploitation and recharge on land subsidence and infrastructure settlement patterns in Shanghai. Eng Geol. 2021 ; 282 : 105995.
  31. Chao BF, Wu YH, Li YS. Impact of artificial reservoir water impoundment on global sea level. Science. 2008 Apr 11;320(5873):212-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1154580. Epub 2008 Mar 13. PMID: 18339903.
  32. Church J A , Clark P U , Cazenave A , Gregory J M , Jevrejeva S , Levermann A , Merrifield M A , Milne G A , Nerem R , Nunn P D . Sea level change. 2013; 1137–1216. In Climate Change : The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA .
  33. Boon JD, Mitchell M, Loftis JD, Malmquist DL. Anthropocene Sea Level Change: A History of Recent Trends Observed in the U.S. East, Gulf, and West Coast Regions. 2018; Special Report in Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering (SRAMSOE) No. 467; Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary: Williamsburg, VA, USA.
  34. Cazenave A. Sea Level Rise. In World Scientific Encyclopedia of Climate Change; World Scientific: Singapore. 2021; 113-122.
  35. Griggs G , Reguero B G. Coastal Adaptation to Climate Change and Sea-Level Rise. Water. 2021 ; 13 : 2151. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/w13162151
  36. Lievin M, Kocha C, Courcol B, Philipps S, Denis I, Guinle T. Reprocessing of Sea Level L2P Products for 28 Years of Altimetry Missions. OSTST. 2020: https://www.aviso.altimetry.fr/en/data/ucts/ocean indicator products/mean sea level.html.
  37. DeConto RM, Pollard D. Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea-level rise. Nature. 2016 Mar 31;531(7596):591-7. doi: 10.1038/nature17145. PMID: 27029274.
  38. Kulp SA, Strauss BH. New elevation data triple estimates of global vulnerability to sea-level rise and coastal flooding. Nat Commun. 2019 Oct 29;10(1):4844. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12808-z. Erratum in: Nat Commun. 2019 Dec 12;10(1):5752. PMID: 31664024; PMCID: PMC6820795.
  39. Hinkel J, van Vuuren DP, Nicholls RJ, Klein RJT, Vuuren DP, Nicholls RJ, Klein RJT. The effects of adaptation and mitigation on coastal flood impacts during the 21st century. An application of the DIVA and IMAGE models. Clim Chang. 2013; 117: 783–794.
  40. Hoggart SPG, Hanley ME, Parker DJ, Simmonds DJ, Bilton DT, Filipova-Marinova M, Franklin EL, Kotsev I, Penning-Rowsell EC, Rundle SD. The consequences of doing nothing: The effects of seawater flooding on coastal zones. Coast Eng. 2014; 87: 169–182.
  41. Hsiang S, Kopp R, Jina A, Rising J, Delgado M, Mohan S, Rasmussen DJ, Muir-Wood R, Wilson P, Oppenheimer M, Larsen K, Houser T. Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States. Science. 2017 Jun 30;356(6345):1362-1369. doi: 10.1126/science.aal4369. PMID: 28663496.
  42. Beck MW, Losada IJ, Menéndez P, Reguero BG, Díaz-Simal P, Fernández F. The global flood protection savings provided by coral reefs. Nat Commun. 2018 Jun 12;9(1):2186. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04568-z. PMID: 29895942; PMCID: PMC5997709.
  43. Reguero BG, Beck MW, Bresch DN, Calil J, Meliane I. Comparing the cost effectiveness of nature-based and coastal adaptation: A case study from the Gulf Coast of the United States. PLoS One. 2018 Apr 11;13(4):e0192132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192132. PMID: 29641611; PMCID: PMC5894966.
  44. Reguero BG, Storlazzi CD, Gibbs AE, Shope JB, Cole AD, Cumming KA, Beck MW. The value of US coral reefs for flood risk reduction. Nat Sustain. 2021; 1: 11.
  45. De Almeida BA, Mostafavi A. Resilience of Infrastructure Systems to Sea-Level Rise in Coastal Areas: Impacts, Adaptation Measures, and Implementation Challenges. Sustainability. 2016; 8: 1115.
  46. Zhang K, Douglas BC, Leatherman SP. Global Warming and Coastal Erosion. Clim Chang. 2004; 64: 41–58.
  47. Ghazali N H M , Awang N A , Mahmud M , Mokhtar A. Impact of Sea Level Rise and Tsunami on Coastal Areas of North-West Peninsular Malaysia. Irrig Drain. 2018 ; 67 : 119-129.
  48. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Coastal Zone Management Subgroup; Dronkers JJ, Misdorp R, Spradley JR. Strategies for Adaptation to Sea Level Rise. 1990; Ministry of Transport and Public Works, Rijkswaterstaat, Tidal Waters Division: Geneva, Switzerland.
  49. Rashidi MAH, Jamal MH, Hassan MZ, Mohd Sendek SS, Mohd Sopie SL, Abd Hamid MR. Coastal Structures as Beach Erosion Control and Sea Level Rise Adaptation in Malaysia: A Review. Water. 2021 ; 13 : 1741. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13131741.
  50. Heurtefeux H, Sauboua P, Lanzellotti P, Bichot A. Coastal Risk Management Modes: The Managed Realignment as a Risk Conception More Integrated. 2011; In Risk Management in Environment, Production and Economy; Intech Open: London, UK.
  51. Sarkar MSK, Begum R, Pereira J, Jaafar A, Saari MY. Impacts of and Adaptations to Sea Level Rise in Malaysia. Asian J Water Environ Pollut. 2014; 11: 29-36.
  52. Gracia A, Rangel-Buitrago N, Oakley JA, Williams AT. Use of ecosystems in coastal erosion management. Ocean Coast Manag. 2018; 156: 277-289.
  53. Nyborg K, Anderies JM, Dannenberg A, Lindahl T, Schill C, Schlüter M, Adger WN, Arrow KJ, Barrett S, Carpenter S, Chapin FS 3rd, Crépin AS, Daily G, Ehrlich P, Folke C, Jager W, Kautsky N, Levin SA, Madsen OJ, Polasky S, Scheffer M, Walker B, Weber EU, Wilen J, Xepapadeas A, de Zeeuw A. Social norms as solutions. Science. 2016 Oct 7;354(6308):42-43. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf8317. PMID: 27846488.
  54. Bisaro A, Hinkel J. Governance of social dilemmas in climate change adaptation. Nat Clim Chang. 2016; 6: 354-359.
  55. Narayan S. Global Adaptation to Sea-Level Rise and Coastal Hazards Must Fit Local Contexts. One Earth. 2020 ; 3 : 405-408.
  56. Airoldi L , Abbiati M , Beck M W , Hawkins S J , Jonsson P R , Martin D , Moschella P S , Sundelöf A , Thompson R C , Åberg P. An ecological perspective on the deployment and design of low-crested and other hard coastal defense structures. Coast Eng. 2005 ; 52 : 1073-1087.
  57. Global Commission on Adaptation. Adapt Now: A Global Call for Leadership on Climate Resilience. 2019. https://gca.org/reports/adapt-now-a-global-call-for-leadership-on-climate-resilience/