Abstract

Review Article

Telemedicine on Earth can learn from Spaceflight

Godard Brigitte*

Published: 15 July, 2025 | Volume 9 - Issue 1 | Pages: 018-034

Telemedicine has become widely used, primarily following or during the COVID pandemic.

However, it was used a long time ago in specific cases, like submarines and space. Telemedicine has been developed to facilitate diagnosis and treatment in areas without physicians, either because the area is isolated without a medical doctor (as in submarines and space) or because we need expertise.

This article is a review using studies selected via PubMed to collect generic knowledge on some technical details on both sides: Earth and Space, where telemedicine activity is regularly provided. The goal was to compare tools, data collected, and ways of improvement in each area. As experienced on both sides, indeed, the author has already worked in the spaceflight area with astronauts as well as doing teleconsultations with patients nowadays, which allows us to see how we could improve the way we are doing teleconsultation on Earth by teaching the users as done with the astronauts in the pre-flight period. It seems telemedicine will still be mandatory for a while because as seen in many countries even out of the scope of isolated area (or very difficult to be accessed (like mountains, desert …), more and more small cities and even bigger are lacking general practitioner (GP) as well as some specialists. Taking into account the time needed to have a functional doctor (for a GP mainly 8 years and for specialists longer, up to 12 years), telemedicine should improve and take a real place in the health system.

This review gives a few definitions, also the term telehealth or e-health is widely used. It refers to the use of an internet communication system to transmit data, receive data, communicate in real time, and guide and provide healthcare services to the patient remotely.

Improvements in technologies have mainly been done for Earth applications, and tools are becoming smaller and more resistant. The different purposes of using telemedicine are increasing nowadays, and it is not used only because of a lack of physicians but to teach remotely and avoid travel, as well as to have direct access /advice with a specialist. We can find a lot of reasons to use it.

Living in space is a real challenge for the human body used to gravity. As explained in a lot of reviews, the body in space loses bone, muscle, and has changes in heart volume and excitability. All the body systems will suffer from microgravity. Other factors impacting the body in space are the high level of ionized radiation, plus isolation. This is why, since the beginning of space flight, the so-called flight surgeon (more GP of the astronaut than a surgeon) is using telemedicine with the astronauts to prevent disease and, in case a medical event happens, to help the astronaut receive a diagnosis and efficient treatment. The actual ISS, International Space Station, allows real-time communication with the astronauts. This will be used for direct discussion or conferences to check the medical/psychological/fitness status. In other cases, remote access can always be done to communicate pictures or movies to provide advice on health or science. Furthermore, some medical tests will be done to guide the astronauts because some tools need real expertise to be interpreted correctly. In that case, eye exam is a good example: an astronaut uses devices following the recommendation of the specialist based on the NASA Console in Houston.

Of course, new improvements are needed to facilitate the next challenges of spaceflight, also going a step further beyond LEO (Low Earth Orbit), like doing an interplanetary trip and going to Mars. In that next scenario, to allow the mission where the Earth will not be seen anymore, when the real-time exchange will not be feasible, a new autonomy of the astronauts will be required.

As on Earth, space with all technologies like satellite is not only used as for direct health care facility with the astronauts but also in a more preventive way. It is possible to follow changes on the ground, climate changes too, as a witness to a possible new epidemic, and another specific use is to help in locating people.

Finally, we see how the way telemedicine is done in space could help improve telemedicine on the ground. First of all, we could improve telemedicine in many ways on Earth for classical consultation by increasing the utilization of simple tools like otoscope and… more in that case we need to train the patient like the astronauts are trained on ground before flying, this has a huge positive effect in allowing easier diagnostic and then better treatment for example when good pictures are provided.

The new tools as Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Virtual Reality (VR), on trial if needed for long-duration missions and specifically for missions beyond low Earth orbit, should be beneficial as well on Earth.

Maybe the big challenge for Earth’s Telemedicine is increasing the trust in practitioners who are still convinced that this way of providing medicine could be a competitor, and for that reason, they are reluctant to use it.

Nowadays, it should become more and more obvious that we need to work on some specific weak points, like security, training in using tools to make sure telemedicine is efficient and useful, where we have a lack of physicians.

Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.acee.1001076 Cite this Article Read Full Article PDF

Keywords:

Telemedicine; Telehealth; Remote real-time; Data; Safety; Security; Training; Spaceflight; Microgravity

References

  1. Pujos M, Roux P, Tabarly J, Ducassé JL. Maritime telemedicine consultation and regulation. Maritime Medical Consultation Center – CCMM. Chapter 31. Medical aid at sea. 2013. Available from: https://www.sfmu.org/upload/70_formation/02_eformation/02_congres/Urgences/urgences2013/donnees/pdf/031_Pujos.pdf
  2. Cermack M. Monitoring and telemedicine support in remote environments and human space flight. Br J Anaesth. 2006;97(1):107-14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/ael132
  3. Restier-Verlet J, El-Nachef L, Ferlazzo ML, Al-Choboq J, Granzotto A, Bouchet A, et al. Radiation on Earth or in Space: What Does It Change? Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(7):3739. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33916740/
  4. Hodkinson PD, Anderton RA, Posselt BN, Fong KJ. An overview of space medicine. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119(suppl_1):i143-i153. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29161391/
  5. Marazziti D, Arone A, Ivaldi T, Kuts K, Loganovsky K. Space missions: psychological and psychopathological issues. CNS Spectr. 2022;27(5):536-540. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34027847/
  6. Law J, Van Baalen M, Foy M, Mason SS, Mendez C, Wear ML, et al. Relationship between carbon dioxide levels and reported headaches on the International Space Station. J Occup Environ Med. 2014;56(5):477-83. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24806559/
  7. Kadem M. The etiology of spaceflight-associated hearing loss. UWOMJ. 2018;87. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5206/uwomj.v87i1.1811
  8. Clark JB. Chapter 12. Decompression-Related Disorders: Pressurization Systems, Barotrauma, and Altitude Sickness. In: Barrat M, Pool SL, editors. Principles of clinical medicine for space-flight. New York: Springer; 2008;247–72.
  9. Kandarpa K, Schneider V, Ganapathy K. Human health during space travel: An overview. Neurol India. 2019;67(Suppl S2):S176–S81. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886.259123
  10. Smith SM, Heer M, Shackelford LC, Sibonga JD, Spatz J, Pietrzyk RA, et al. Bone metabolism and renal stone risk during International Space Station missions. Bone. 2015;81:712-720. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2015.10.002
  11. Gao Y, Arfat Y, Wang H, Goswami N. Muscle Atrophy Induced by Mechanical Unloading: Mechanisms and Potential Countermeasures. Front Physiol. 2018;9:235. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00235
  12. Hughson RL, Robertson AD, Arbeille P, Shoemaker JK, Rush JW, Fraser KS, et al. Increased post-flight carotid artery stiffness and in-flight insulin resistance resulting from 6-month spaceflight in male and female astronauts. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2016;310(5):H628-38. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00802.2015
  13. Crucian B, Sams CF. Evidence report: risk of crew adverse health event due to altered immune response, human health countermeasures element. 2015. Available from: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20150008177/downloads/20150008177.pdf
  14. Strollo F. Hormonal changes in humans during spaceflight. Adv Space Biol Med. 1999;7:99-129. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1569-2574(08)60008-8
  15. Mader TH, Gibson CR, Pass AF, Kramer LA, Lee AG, Fogarty J, et al. Optic disc edema, globe flattening, choroidal folds, and hyperopic shifts observed in astronauts after long-duration space flight. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(10):2058-69. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.06.021
  16. Olabi AA, Lawless HT, Hunter JB, Levitsky DA, Halpern BP. The effect of microgravity and space flight on the chemical senses. J Food Sci. 2002;67(2):468-78. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2002.tb10622.x
  17. Godard B. Gut Microbiota Studies Could Improve the Health of the Astronauts for Long Duration Spaceflight. Acta Scientific Gastrointestinal Disorders. 2025;8(2):13-31. Available from: https://actascientific.com/ASGIS/ASGIS-08-0693.php
  18. Smith SM, Heer MA, Shackelford LC, Sibonga JD, Ploutz-Snyder L, Zwart SR. Benefits for bone from resistance exercise and nutrition in long-duration spaceflight: Evidence from biochemistry and densitometry. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(9):1896-906. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1647
  19. Craig J, Patterson V. Introduction to the practice of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare. 2005;11:3–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633x0501100102
  20. Ansarian M, Baharlouei Z. Applications and Challenges of Telemedicine: Privacy-Preservation as a Case Study. Arch Iran Med. 2023;26(11):654-661. Available from: https://doi.org/10.34172/aim.2023.96
  21. Du Y, Gu Y. The development of evaluation scale of the patient satisfaction with telemedicine: a systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024;24:31. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-024-02436-z
  22. World Health Organization. Telemedicine: Opportunities and Developments in Member States: Report on the Second Global Survey on eHealth. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.
  23. World Health Organization. Global Diffusion of eHealth: Making Universal Health Coverage Achievable. Report of the Third Global Survey on eHealth. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.
  24. Tuckson RV, Edmunds M, Hodgkins ML. Telehealth. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(16):1585-1592. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsr1503323
  25. Melot B, Drouet F, Gérard C, Mahé B, Cousin S, Salomon J, et al. Standardized Reasons for Consultations on a French Telemedicine Platform. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024;316:530-531. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3233/shti240466
  26. Li X, Huang L, Zhang H, Liang Z. Enabling Telemedicine From the System-Level Perspective: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res. 2025;27:e65932. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2196/65932
  27. Becevic M, Sheets LR, Wallach E, McEowen A, Bass A, Mutrux ER, et al. Telehealth and Telemedicine in Missouri. Mo Med. 2020;117(3):228-234. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32636555/
  28. Shah AQ, Noronha N, Chin-See R, Hanna C, Kadri Z, Marwaha A, et al. The use and effects of telemedicine on complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine practices: a scoping review. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2023;23(1):275. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-04100-x
  29. Moura P, Fazendeiro P, Inácio PRM, Vieira-Marques P, Ferreira A. Assessing Access Control Risk for mHealth: A Delphi Study to Categorize Security of Health Data and Provide Risk Assessment for Mobile Apps. J Healthc Eng. 2020;2020:5601068. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5601068
  30. Williams DR, Bashshur RL, Pool SL, Doarn CR, Merrell RC, Logan JS. A strategic vision for telemedicine and medical informatics in space flight. Telemed J E Health. 2000 Winter;6(4):441-8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1089/15305620050503924
  31. Antonsen E, Walton M. Presentation: NASA and telemedicine. Now and Beyond. 2017. Available from: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20170009943/downloads/20170009943.pdf
  32. Lee AG, Mader TH, Gibson CR, Brunstetter TJ, Tarver WJ. Space flight-associated neuro-ocular syndrome (SANS). Eye (Lond). 2018;32(7):1164-1167. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-018-0070-y
  33. Sater SH, Sass AM, Rohr JJ, Marshall-Goebel K, Ploutz-Snyder RJ, Ethier CR, et al. Automated MRI-based quantification of posterior ocular globe flattening and recovery after long-duration spaceflight. Eye (Lond). 2021;35(7):1869-1878. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01408-1
  34. Clark JB, Allen CS. Chapter 25. In: Barratt MR, Pool SL, editors. Principle of clinical medicine for space-flight. New York: Springer; 2008;521–33. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-0-387-68164-1_24
  35. Allen CS, Goodman JR. Preparing for Flight—The Process of Assessing the ISS Acoustic Environment. The 2003 National Conference on Noise Control Engineering, Paper # NC03–006. 2003. Available from: https://scispace.com/pdf/preparing-for-flight-the-process-of-assessing-the-iss-1eqzd1lc0u.pdf
  36. Petersen N, Jaekel P, Rosenberger A, Weber T, Scott J, Castrucci F, et al. Exercise in space: the European Space Agency approach to in-flight exercise countermeasures for long-duration missions on ISS. Extrem Physiol Med. 2016;5:9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13728-016-0050-4
  37. Loehr JA, Guilliams ME, Petersen N, Hirsch N, Kawashima S, Ohshima H. Physical Training for Long-Duration Spaceflight. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2015;86(12 Suppl):A14-A23. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3357/amhp.ec03.2015
  38. Hackney KJ, Scott JM, Hanson AM, English KL, Downs ME, Ploutz-Snyder LL. The Astronaut-Athlete: Optimizing Human Performance in Space. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(12):3531-45. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000001191
  39. Smith SM, Zwart SR, Heer M. Evidence report: Risk factor of inadequate nutrition (JSC-CN-32587). 2015a. Available from: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20150000512
  40. Smith SM, Zwart SR, Heer M. Human adaptation to spaceflight: The role of nutrition. 2015b.
  41. Dunn C, Boyd M, Orengo I. Dermatologic manifestations in spaceflight: A review. Dermatol Online J. 2018;24. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30695973/
  42. Basner M, Savitt A, Moore TM, Port AM, McGuire S, Ecker AJ, et al. Development and Validation of the Cognition Test Battery for Spaceflight. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2015;86(11):942-52. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3357/amhp.4343.2015
  43. Levin DR, Steller J, Anderson A, Lemery J, Easter B, Hilmers DC, et al. Enabling human space exploration missions through progressively earth-independent medical operations (EIMO). IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2023;10(4):162–67. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/OJEMB.2023.3255513
  44. Levin DR, Klinker N, DeInnocentiis C, Kamine TH. Medical training requirements for exploration medicine compared to current terrestrial training programs. Conference Presentation presented at: Aerospace Medicine Association Annual Scientific Meeting; 2023; New Orleans, LA. Available from: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20230007088/downloads/ExMO%20KSA%20Poster.pdf
  45. Shah J, Ong J, Lee R, Suh A, Waisberg E, Gibson CR, et al. Risk of Permanent Corneal Injury in Microgravity: Spaceflight-Associated Hazards, Challenges to Vision Restoration, and Role of Biotechnology in Long-Term Planetary Missions. Life (Basel). 2025;15(4):602. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/life15040602
  46. Balasingam M, Ebrahim J, Ariffin IA. Tele-echocardiography - Made for astronauts, now in hospitals. Indian Heart J. 2017;69(2):252-254. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2017.01.010
  47. Ravizza M, Giani L, Sheiban FJ, Pedrocchi A, DeWitt J, Ferrigno G. IMU-based classification of resistive exercises for real-time training monitoring on board the International Space Station with potential telemedicine spin-off. PLoS One. 2023;18(8):e0289777. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289777
  48. Netherlands Court of Audit. Focus on the shortage of general practitioners. The Hague: Netherlands Court of Audit; 2025 Apr. Available from: https://english.rekenkamer.nl/publications/reports/2025/04/02/focus-on-shortage-of-general-practitioners
  49. Dietrich D, Dekova R, Davy S, Fahrni G, Geissbühler A. Applications of Space Technologies to Global Health: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(6):e230. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9458
  50. Chaet D, Clearfield R, Sabin JE, Skimming K; Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association. Ethical Practice in Telehealth and Telemedicine. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32(10):1136-1140. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4082-2
  51. ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection — Information security management systems — Requirements. 3rd ed. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2022. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/27001
  52. ISO/IEC 27002:2022, Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection — Information security controls. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2022. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/75652.html
  53. Wylde V, Rawindaran N, Lawrence J, Balasubramanian R, Prakash E, Jayal A, et al. Cybersecurity, Data Privacy and Blockchain: A Review. SN Comput Sci. 2022;3(2):127. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs42979-022-01020-4
  54. Chakraborty I, Edirippulige S, Vigneswara Ilavarasan P. The role of telehealth startups in healthcare service delivery: A systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2023;174:105048. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105048
  55. Lareng L. [Origins of French telemedicine legislation]. Bull Acad Natl Med. 2006;190(2):323-9; discussion 329-30. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17001862/
  56. Petrakaki D, Chamakiotis P, Russell E, Charlwood A. Resistance, tensions and consent to digital working in healthcare. Soc Sci Med. 2025;368:117691. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117691

Figures:

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 1

Figure 3

Similar Articles

Recently Viewed

Read More

Most Viewed

Read More

Help ?