ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) in construction civil: concept that can contribute to the sector

Gilberto Gomes Soares* and Fabio Henrique Pereira

Published: 11 October, 2022 | Volume 6 - Issue 1 | Pages: 064-065

The search for a sustainable development path capable of satisfying the needs of the current generation without compromising the well-being of future generations is not a new challenge. In recent years, climate change and, more generally, the transition to a sustainable development model have become increasingly important. According to the European Central Bank [1], guidelines on sustainable finance, a company aims to develop value by adhering to relevant ideals, such as fair remuneration for employees, respect for ethical and social values and preservation of the environment.

Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.acee.1001043 Cite this Article Read Full Article PDF


  1. European Central Bank. Guide on climate-related and environmental risks ECB.  https://bankingsupervision.europa.eu/press/pr/date/2020/html/ssm. pr201127~5642b6e68d.en.html.
  2. Escrig-Olmedo E, Fernández-Izquierdo MÁ, Ferrero-Ferrero I, Rivera-Lirio JM, Muñoz-Torres Rating the raters: evaluating how ESG rating agencies integrate sustainability principles. Sustainability. 2019; 11(3): 1-16.
  3. United Nations Climate Change, 2015. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its twenty-first session, held in Paris from 30 November to 13 December 2015. Addendum. Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its twenty-first session. UNFCCC Secretariat, Bonn. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/ 2015/cop21/eng/10.pdf.
  4. United Nations, 2015. United Nations Resolution 70/1 Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable United Nations, Geneva. https:// sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publication.
  5. Alonso A, Monzón A, Cascajo R. Comparative analysis of passenger transport sustainability in European cities. Ecological Indicators. 2015; 48: 578-592. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.022.
  6. Batty M, Axhausen KW, Giannotti F, Pozdnoukhov A, Bazzani A, Wachowicz M, Ouzounis G, Portugali Y. Smart cities of the future. The European Physical Special Topics. 2012; 518(1): 481-518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3.
  7. Cappucci M. The ESG integration paradox. J Appl Corp Finance. 2018; 30: 22-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12296
  8. Buallay A. Is sustainability reporting (ESG) associated with performance? Evidence from the European banking sector, Manag. Environ Qual Int J. 2019; 30: 98-115, https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2017-0149.
  9. Humphrey JE, Lee, Y. Shen, The independent effects of environmental, social and governance initiatives on the performance of UK firms, Aust J Manag. 2012; 37: 135-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896211410081.
  10. Garvey GT, Kazdin J, Nash J, LaFond R, Safa H. A Pitfall in Ethical Investing: ESG Disclosures Reveal Vulnerabilities, Not Virtues, Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2840629.
  11. Avetisyan E, Hockerts K. The consolidation of the ESG rating industry as an enactment of institutional retrogression: consolidation of the ESG rating industry. Bus Strat 2017; 26: 316-330. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1919.
  12. Entine J. The myth of social investing: a critique of its practice and consequences for corporate social performance research, Organ. Environ. 2003; 16: 352–368, https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026603256283.
  13. Roth A, Kåberger T. Making transport systems sustainable. Journal of Cleaner Production. 10(4): 361- 371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959- 6526(01)00052-X.
  14. Zito P, Salvo Toward an urban transport sustainability index: an European comparison. European Transport Research Review. 3(4): 179-195. http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s12544-011-0059-0.
  15. Eboli L, Mazzulla G. A methodology for evaluating transit service quality based on subjective and objective measures from the passenger’ s point of Transport Policy. 18(1): 172-181. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.07.007.
  16. Manaugh K, Badami MG, El-Geneidy AM. Integrating social equity into urban transportation planning: a critical evaluation of equity objectives and measures in transportation plans in North America. 2015.

Similar Articles

Recently Viewed

Read More

Most Viewed

Read More

Help ?