Research Article

Investigation and analysis of fracture failure and fatigue cracking in High-rise pavement using simulation software of ABAQUS

Seyed Masoud Hadian*

Published: 27 May, 2019 | Volume 3 - Issue 1 | Pages: 032-039

Assuming that the road infrastructure has been implemented in accordance with specifications and standards, poor adhesion between the two layers of asphalt mix can be a significant cause of pavement problems. The general problem observed with the weak adhesion between the layers is the slip failure. Slipping disruption in areas where transport acceleration increases, in areas where acceleration decreases or may occur in bumps. One of the criteria and a test method for measuring adhesion resistance between the hot mix asphalt layers is needed to improve the surface finish. The main objective of this study is to determine the effect of reducing the coefficient of friction between asphalt layers in the displacement of asphaltic layers. Because performing experimental experiments in the country is a deterrent to this goal, the use of analytical and numerical methods has been shown to play an important role in conducting studies. Therefore, in this paper, using vehicle simulation in ABAQUS software and analyzes, it has been found that decreasing the coefficient of friction (adhesion reduction) increases the interlayer deformation, which causes the surface of the pavement to fail. Three different thicknesses for asphalt cladding, including 4, 6, and 7 centimeters, and three different thicknesses for roller concrete layers of 18, 20 and 22 centimeters are used. Modeling and analysis of pavements with finite element method has been performed and the depth of the asphalt and tensile strain slope is calculated at the maximum level. The results show that the type of asphalt mix has a high impact on the amount of sloping and tensile strain at the maximum level. So that under different conditions it is estimated to be about 2-3 times in the amount of rotation at the surface. Also, the amount of groove and strain in the middle of the procedure is increased by a thickness of 11% the thickness of the roller concrete thickness has not changed, but the surface strain has been reduced by 9%.

Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.acee.1001015 Cite this Article Read Full Article PDF


Fracture failure; Fatigue cracking; High-rise pavement; Analysis; ABAQUS software


  1. Newcomb D, Scofield L. Quiet Pavements Raise the Roof in Europe. Hot Mix Asphalt Technology, National Asphalt Pavement Association. 2004. Ref.: https://bit.ly/2VXz9ul
  2. James R. I-80 Davis OGAC Pavement Noise Study: Traffic Noise Levels Associated With an Open Grade Asphalt Concrete Overlay. Prepared for California Department of Transportation by Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc., Sacramento, CA. 2002. Ref.: https://bit.ly/2M7SDYO
  3. Brown ER. Experience with Stone Mastic Asphalt in the United States, Report No. 93-4, National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn University, Alabama. 1993.
  4. Design and Construction of Stone Matrix Asphalt Mixtures. Report No. 425, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board. 1998.
  5. Hughs C. Designing and Constructing SMA Mixtures - State-of-the-Practice, QIP 122, National Asphalt Pavement Association, Lanham, Maryland. 1999. Ref.: https://bit.ly/2Euf3x4
  6. Nunn ME, Brown A, Weston D, Nicholls JC. Design of long-life flexible pavements for heavy traffic, Report No. 250, Transportation Research Laboratory, Berkshire, United Kingdom. 1997; 1-81. Ref.: https://bit.ly/2VZ3etF
  7. Brown SF, Tam WS, Brunton JM. Structural Evaluation and Overlay Design: Analysis and Implementation. Proc., Sixth International Conference on the Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements. Ann Arbor Mach. 1987; 1: 1013–1028. Ref.: https://bit.ly/2HAOSGZ
  8. Lee HJ, Lee JH, Park HM. Performance evaluation of high modulus asphalt mixtures for long life asphalt pavements, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2005. Ref.: https://bit.ly/2HW3TlM
  9. Huddleston J, Bencher M, Newcomb D. Asphalt Pavement Alliance, Perpetual Pavement. 2004.
  10. Newcomb D, Willis R, Timm D. Perpetual Asphalt Pavements in America. 2010; Ref.: https://bit.ly/1KyeoGA
  11. Advanced Asphalt Technologies (AAT), LLC. Developing a Plan for Validating an Endurance Limit for HMA Pavements. Draft Executive Summary. National Cooperative Highway Research Program Project 9-44. Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC. 2007.
  12. Al-Qadi IL, Wang H, Yoo PJ, Dessouky SH. Dynamic Analysis and In-situ Validation of Perpetual Pavement Response to Vehicular Loading. Paper submitted to Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting. Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC. 2008. Ref.: https://bit.ly/30IwnrC
  13. Liao Y. Viscoelastic FE modeling of asphalt pavements and its applications to U.S. 30 perpetual pavement. Ph.D. Dissertation, Civil Engineering Department, Ohio University, Athens, OH. 2007. Ref.: https://bit.ly/2VZ4nkX
  14. Asphalt Pavement Alliance (APA). Perpetual Pavements. A Synthesis. APA 101, Lanham, Maryland. 2002.
  15. Asphalt Pavement Alliance. I-695 – a classic example of perpetual pavement. 2010.
  16. Pavement Design Guide, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D. C.2002. Ref.: https://bit.ly/2LKjwBV
  17. Abraham H. Asphalts and Allied Substances: Their Occurrence, Modes of Production, Uses in the Arts and Methods of Testing, 3d Edition. D. Van Nostrand Co., Inc. NY. 1929; Ref.: https://bit.ly/2VS7JkQ
  18. Elseifi MA, Al-Qadi IL, Yoo PJ, Janajreh I. Quantification of pavement Damage Caused by Dual and Wide-Base Tires. Journal of the Transportation Research Board No. 2005; 125-135. Ref.: https://bit.ly/2VIJgyh
  19. Elseifi MA, Al-Qadi IL, Yoo PJ. Viscoelastic Modeling and Field Validation of Flexible Pavements. ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics. 2006; 132: 172-178. Ref.: https://bit.ly/2HPwoS3
  20. Instrumentation for Flexible Pavements-Field Performance of Selected Sensors. U.S. Department of Transportation. 1992; 1. Ref.: https://bit.ly/2HAj2Ko
  21. Kim SS, Sarggand S, Masada T, Hernandez J. Ohio Department of Transportation Office of Research and Development and the United States Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. State Job Number 4377046. 2010.
  22. Liao Y, Sargand SM, Khoury IS, Harrigal A. In-Depth Investigation th of Premature Distresses of Four Ohio SHRP Test Road Sections,” 86 TRB Annual Meeting (CD-ROM), Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington DC. 2007.
  23. Masada T. Laboratory Characterization of Materials and Data Management for Ohio-SHRP Project (U.S. 23), Report No. FHWA/OH-2001/07, Department of Civil Engineering, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio. 2007. Ref.: https://bit.ly/2wiYAHq
  24. Masada T, Sargand SM, Liao Y. Resilient Modulus Prediction Model for Fine-Grained Soils in Ohio: Preliminary Study . International Conference on Perpetual Pavement (CDROM), Columbus, Ohio. 2006; Ref.: https://bit.ly/2VXFg1L
  25. Sargand SM, Khoury IS, Romanello MT, Figueroa JL. Seasonal and Load Response Instrumentation of the Way-30 Perpetual Pavement. International Conference on Perpetual Pavement (CDROM), Columbus, Ohio. 2006.
  26. Perpetual Bituminous Pavements. Transportation Research Circular 503, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council. 2001.
  27. Hernandez JA. Evaluation of the Response of Perpetual Pavement at Accelerated Pavement Loading Facility: Finite Element Analysis and Experimental Investigation. Russ College of Engineering and Technology of Ohio University, In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science. 2010. Ref.: https://bit.ly/2VPJ7Ja
  28. Al-Qadi IL, Wang H, Yoo PJ, Dessouky SH. Dynamic analysis and in-situ validation of perpetual pavement response to vehicular loading. Transportation Research Record: J Transportation Res Board. 2008; 2087: 29-39. Ref.: https://bit.ly/30IwnrC
  29. Garcia G, Thompson MR. Strain and pulse duration considerations for extended-life hot-mix asphalt pavement design. Transportation Research Record: J Transportation Res Board. 2008; 2087: 3 -11. Ref.: https://bit.ly/2QhEVAM
  30. Hornyak N, Crovetti JA. Analysis of load pulse durations for Marquette interchange instrumentation project. Transportation Research Record: J Transportation Res Board. 2009; 2094: 53-61. Ref.: https://bit.ly/2VZ8mhp
  31. Loulizi A, AL-Qadi IL, Elseifi M. Difference between in situ flexible pavements measured and calculated stresses and strains. Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE. 2006; 132: 574-579. Ref.: https://bit.ly/2Woz9CY
  32. Park D, Martin AE, Masad E. Effects of no uniform tore contact stresses on pavement response. J Transportation Engineering, ASCE. 2005; 113: 873-879. Ref.: https://bit.ly/2Ewtgtc
  33. Rith M, Kim YK, Hong SJ, Lee SW. Effect of horizontal loading on RCC-base composite pavement performance at heavy duty area. Construction and Building Materials. 2016; 131: 741-745. Ref.: https://bit.ly/2HSnvqH
  34. Zhao Y, Alae M, Fu G. Investigation of mechanisms of top-down fatigue cracking of asphalt pavement. Road Materials and Pavement Design. 2018; 6: 1436-1447. Ref.: https://bit.ly/2wgDd9N


Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 1

Figure 3

Figure 1

Figure 4

Figure 1

Figure 5

Similar Articles

Recently Viewed

Read More

Most Viewed

Read More

Help ?